From: "Hans-Peter Jansen" <hpj-2x7n3sizJbFeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: klibc's nfsmount failure with 2.6.27.21, while 2.6.25.20 was fine
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:23:58 +0200
Message-ID: <200904151923.58709.hpj@urpla.net>
References: <200904151250.49372.hpj@urpla.net> <200904151548.12291.hpj@urpla.net> <0D024344-54E3-4A09-BE78-3E67667E05E7@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:52280 "EHLO
	moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754575AbZDORYN (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:24:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <0D024344-54E3-4A09-BE78-3E67667E05E7@oracle.com>
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org>

Am Mittwoch, 15. April 2009 schrieb Chuck Lever:
>
> When using rpcbind instead of portmapper, what does the output of
> "rpcinfo" look like on the server?

It's dumped in the mail starting this thread.

Thanks, 
Pete