From: Greg Banks Subject: Re: [patch 00/29] SGI enhancedNFS patches Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:32:00 +1100 Message-ID: References: <20090331202800.739621000@sgi.com> <20090401002306.GC26583@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Greg Banks , Linux NFS ML To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.232]:32675 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754628AbZDADcC (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:32:02 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f9so3368194rvb.1 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:32:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090401002306.GC26583@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:23 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 07:28:00AM +1100, Greg Banks wrote: >> Bruce: all of these are potentially candidates for 2.6.30. > > It's probably too late for 2.6.30 (the 4.1 stuff I've promised to try to > make a serious attempt at, but that's it). I'll publish a for-2.6.31 > branch as soon as I can.... (But of course anything that looks like a > bugfix I'll keep considering for 2.6.30.) No worries. I figured as much, but the patches really did need to be posted this week. -- Greg.