From: Rob Gardner Subject: Re: [patch 18/29] knfsd: dynamically expand the reply cache Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:24:18 -0600 Message-ID: <4A1C5E02.50204@hp.com> References: <20090331202800.739621000@sgi.com> <20090331202944.386752000@sgi.com> <20090526185701.GE31567@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Linux NFS ML To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.46]:42038 "EHLO g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755563AbZEZVYS (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 17:24:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090526185701.GE31567@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > Hm, just on the subject; looks like someone (cc'd) is presenting at the > Linux Symposium on reply cache improvements: > > http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2009/view_abstract.php?content_key=89 > > I assume they're talking about the linux server? Will there be patches? Yes, the paper is referring to the linux server. I'd like to submit patches someday, but right now we're still working with an ancient kernel and it'll be a while until we get more current. In the meantime, the final paper is due at the end of this week and I'd love for a couple of 'experts' to review it. Anyone interested? Rob Gardner