From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [patch 18/29] knfsd: dynamically expand the reply cache Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 17:52:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20090526215216.GM1432@fieldses.org> References: <20090331202800.739621000@sgi.com> <20090331202944.386752000@sgi.com> <20090526185701.GE31567@fieldses.org> <4A1C5E02.50204@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linux NFS ML To: Rob Gardner Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([141.211.133.115]:43560 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757166AbZEZVwP (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 17:52:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A1C5E02.50204@hp.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 03:24:18PM -0600, Rob Gardner wrote: > J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> >> Hm, just on the subject; looks like someone (cc'd) is presenting at the >> Linux Symposium on reply cache improvements: >> >> http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2009/view_abstract.php?content_key=89 >> >> I assume they're talking about the linux server? Will there be patches? > > Yes, the paper is referring to the linux server. I'd like to submit > patches someday, but right now we're still working with an ancient > kernel and it'll be a while until we get more current. In the meantime, > the final paper is due at the end of this week and I'd love for a couple > of 'experts' to review it. Anyone interested? I'd certainly be interested, though I can't promise I'll have time for a conscientious review. --b.