From: Greg Banks Subject: Re: [patch 18/29] knfsd: dynamically expand the reply cache Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:28:14 +1000 Message-ID: References: <20090331202800.739621000@sgi.com> <20090331202944.386752000@sgi.com> <20090526185701.GE31567@fieldses.org> <4A1C5E02.50204@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Linux NFS ML To: Rob Gardner Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f190.google.com ([209.85.221.190]:51222 "EHLO mail-qy0-f190.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751229AbZE0A2O (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 20:28:14 -0400 Received: by qyk28 with SMTP id 28so3945614qyk.33 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:28:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A1C5E02.50204@hp.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Rob Gardner wrote: > J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> >> Hm, just on the subject; looks like someone (cc'd) is presenting at the >> Linux Symposium on reply cache improvements: >> >[...] In the meantime, the final paper is > due at the end of this week and I'd love for a couple of 'experts' to review > it. Anyone interested? > Yes please. The abstract sounds very interesting. -- Greg.