From: Sven Geggus Subject: Re: 2.6.29+ NFS-Server Problem "reconnect_path: npd != pd" Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 22:32:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20090528203228.GA6056@geggus.net> References: <20090521142026.GA5566@geggus.net> <1242924599.6687.1.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090521165751.GA4428@geggus.net> <1242927133.6687.4.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1242929546.22947.11.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090528202803.GF13860@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Trond Myklebust , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090528202803.GF13860@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: J. Bruce Fields schrieb am Donnerstag, den 28. Mai um 22:28 Uhr: > Looks like you have subtree_check set on the "bad" export, and > no_subtree_check set on the "good" export. subtree_check can result in > spurious stale errors when files are renamed, so it's possible this is > by design. > > You say you get that message on 296.29.x but not 2.6.27.x. Exactly! http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527517 may refer the same bug. > And you say you also get stale filehandle errors. Only on 2.6.29.x. Everything works fine qwith the older Kernel. > I assume you didn't get the same stale filehandle errors on 2.6.27.x? No errors on the older Kernel. Sven -- "In my opinion MS is a lot better at making money than it is at making good operating systems" (Linus Torvalds, August 1997) /me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web