From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: NFS and NFSv4 lists? Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:07:04 -0400 Message-ID: <1250186824.16167.31.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> References: <20090813174923.GA15213@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from mail-out2.uio.no ([129.240.10.58]:36008 "EHLO mail-out2.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752115AbZHMSHI (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:07:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090813174923.GA15213@infradead.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 13:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Is there really a reason to keep a separate NFSv4 mailing list? v4 > support is part of the same nfs/nfsd modules and quite deeply > interwinded with the v2/v3 code. It seems most posts to the NFSv4 list > get cross-posted to the regular nfs list anyway. I certainly agree that we can start deprecating the nfsv4@linux-nfs.org list, but I'm reluctant to shut it down completely as long as we're seeing some non-cross posted traffic there. How about if we keep it open for another 6 months, and use that time to educate those people who post only on nfsv4@linux-nfs.org to move on to linux-nfs? Cheers Trond