From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: VM issue causing high CPU loads Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:31:37 -0400 Message-ID: <1252067497.13204.3.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> References: <4A92A25A.4050608@yohan.staff.proxad.net> <20090824162155.ce323f08.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4A96463E.5080002@corp.free.fr> <4A9C34F8.2010307@corp.free.fr> <20090902170642.f4381c1d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1251982884.18338.9.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <4A9FC719.9020104@corp.free.fr> <1251986526.18338.29.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090903200550.GB5257@hostway.ca> <1252010965.18338.63.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090903222253.GA8405@hostway.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Yohan , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown , "J. Bruce Fields" , mikevs@xs4all.net To: Simon Kirby Return-path: Received: from mail-out2.uio.no ([129.240.10.58]:50488 "EHLO mail-out2.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753612AbZIDMbm (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:31:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090903222253.GA8405@hostway.ca> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 15:22 -0700, Simon Kirby wrote: > So, for environments with all POSIX systems, what do you think about > perhaps a mount or export flag that violates the spec on purpose to allow > numeric IDs to be used? No! I'm not interested in starting a LinuxPrivateNFSv4 protocol on top of everything else we've got... Trond