From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] nfsd: Fix independence of a few nfsd related headers Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:57:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4AFAD0EA.2080909@panasas.com> References: <4ADEC1EF.8040107@panasas.com> <1256112873-32495-1-git-send-email-bharrosh@panasas.com> <1256171298.6809.1.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <4AE01569.9000002@panasas.com> <1256220146.6402.23.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <4AE08165.2040100@panasas.com> <20091104220927.GS11637@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: pNFS Mailing List , NFS list , Andy Adamson To: "J. Bruce Fields" , Trond Myklebust , Benny Halevy Return-path: Received: from dip-colo-pa.panasas.com ([67.152.220.67]:39611 "EHLO daytona.int.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755903AbZKKO5o (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:57:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091104220927.GS11637@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/05/2009 12:09 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 05:59:33PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > I'm assuming Trond's objection is just to the patch changelog > (specifically, to the statement that any header "should be compilation > independent"), not to these specific changes. > > --b. Ping Bruce? Trond? whatsup? Can Benny put these patches in his tree? He said he would be happy to hold them for a while, but only if they will be eventually accepted into the tree as a pnfs pre-requisite. Please ACK on these patches? I have to make all these put-the-includes-back patches to just make the tree compile. Boaz