From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: regression, bisected: getcwd() ENOENT on NFS4... Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:59:46 +0900 Message-ID: <1258117186.7430.2.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> References: <6278d2220910251631j40caec00lf2dee6159947d983@mail.gmail.com> <1256563190.3742.4.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <6278d2220911010447v5889b9bbt33f685ef7669cc45@mail.gmail.com> <6278d2220911040136m4cadc0f5sb71b8306bf02fc5b@mail.gmail.com> <1257443105.3114.14.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <6278d2220911051641g5a626229o27dfc66faf588ca4@mail.gmail.com> <6278d2220911130452u6e40662do44bcbcbaf9bad714@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Linux Kernel , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel J Blueman Return-path: Received: from mail-out2.uio.no ([129.240.10.58]:45665 "EHLO mail-out2.uio.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751684AbZKMM7q (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:59:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6278d2220911130452u6e40662do44bcbcbaf9bad714-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 12:52 +0000, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > Hi Trond, > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Daniel J Blueman > wrote: > > This fixes the behaviour and passes some heavy testing with two good > > test-cases, with 2.6.32-rc6. As well, this would be good value for the > > stable stream. I've sync'd the bugzilla report. > > Is there opportunity to get this regression fix into 2.6.32-rc8, since > -rc8 may be the (pen)ultimate before final? It has been committed in the linux-next tree for testing for a few days now. The plan is to send it on to Linus and stable@kernel.org in a couple more days. Cheers Trond