From: Olaf Kirch Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] register NFS_ACL with rpcbind Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:17:41 +0100 Message-ID: <200911031017.41564.okir@suse.de> References: <4AEF2D19.5090409@redhat.com> <4AEF562B.9070606@redhat.com> <200911031013.27247.agruen@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: Peter Staubach , NFS list , "J. Bruce Fields" To: Andreas Gruenbacher Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:47947 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754074AbZKCJT1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 04:19:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200911031013.27247.agruen@suse.de> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 03 November 2009 10:13:27 Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > I don't understand the reasoning behind .vs_hidden for NFS_ACL, hopef= ully > Olaf can clarify. NFS_ACL is the only user of .vs_hidden as far as I = can > see though, so if this is changeg, shouldn't the entire commit bc5fea= 4 > which introduced the flag be reverted? I can't remember the details of that one. I do remember that this is based on someone's request who told me that we shouldn't register nfsac= l with portmap. I didn't check myself whether Solaris did or did not do it at that time. I have no issue with reverting that change, and removing the whole =2Evs_hidden kludge too. Thanks, Olaf --=20 Neo didn't bring down the Matrix. SOA did. (soafacts.com) -------------------------------------------- Olaf Kirch - Director Server (okir@novell.com) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 N=FCrnberg GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N=FCrnberg)