From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] nfs: fix ISO C90 warning Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:40:19 -0500 Message-ID: <1261003219.13878.6.camel@localhost> References: <20091215165309.58e98eea.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091216142334.6a0ba115.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Dunlap Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091216142334.6a0ba115.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 14:23 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap > > Fix gcc ISO C90 warning: > > fs/nfs/callback.c:356: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap > --- > fs/nfs/callback.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- linux-next-20091215.orig/fs/nfs/callback.c > +++ linux-next-20091215/fs/nfs/callback.c > @@ -352,8 +352,8 @@ static int check_gss_callback_principal( > static int nfs_callback_authenticate(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) > { > struct nfs_client *clp; > - RPC_IFDEBUG(char buf[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN]); > int ret = SVC_OK; > + RPC_IFDEBUG(char buf[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN]); > What version of gcc is giving rise to this warning? RPC_IFDEBUG is a macro that either evaluates to its argument, or to nothing, depending on whether or not RPC_DEBUG is defined or not. In neither case should it evaluate to anything illegal under C90 rules afaics. Trond