From: Trond Myklebust Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/12] Fix session reset deadlocks Version 4 Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:12:18 -0500 Message-ID: <1260047538.29208.12.camel@localhost> References: <273FE88A07F5D445824060902F70034408A1A330@SACMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <1260043442.2624.92.camel@localhost> <273FE88A07F5D445824060902F7003440637144A@SACMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: "Adamson, Andy" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: "Labiaga, Ricardo" Return-path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:4043 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752688AbZLEVM0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Dec 2009 16:12:26 -0500 Received: from sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com (sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.99.115.27]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id nB5LCXoN016705 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 13:12:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <273FE88A07F5D445824060902F7003440637144A-hX7t0kiaRRpT+ZUat5FNkAK/GNPrWCqfQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 12:55 -0800, Labiaga, Ricardo wrote: > Tried with this patch but it didn't make a difference. You are still seeing RPC calls with 0 session ids? > I haven't tried applying the second cleanup patch yet since it > didn't apply cleanly on top of nfs-for-next. Is this the branch you > used? I've pushed out all patches (including the cleanup patch) onto nfs-for-next now... Trond