From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] lockd: Remove unused nfsd headers #includes Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:27:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20091203172728.GF1393@fieldses.org> References: <4B0C1EB7.50508@panasas.com> <4B0C1FE0.8040105@panasas.com> <20091125201011.GG32502@fieldses.org> <20091125202323.GJ32502@fieldses.org> <4B0E76F5.1030006@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linux Kernel , linux-parisc , sparclinux , linux-s390 , NFS list , pNFS Mailing List , Andrew Morton To: Boaz Harrosh Return-path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:45174 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753458AbZLCR0X (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:26:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B0E76F5.1030006@panasas.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 02:39:17PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 11/25/2009 10:23 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 03:10:11PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:03:12PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > >>> > >>> In what history where these ever needed? Well not > >>> any more. > >> > >> Applied, thanks.--b. > > > > Um, I said that before I actually tried to compile it.... OK, dropping > > for now (assuming I'm missing some earlier patch). > > > > --b. > > > > OK, I didn't realize it but, yes I have these on top of the previous 6 > so it makes sense. > > I have posted the previous 6 rebased on your new current tree, have you seen > it? All the patches are the same but [5/6] which has a "version 3". Do I need > to re post? Apologies, yes, would you mind reposting? --b.