From: Neil Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: remove unnecessary svc_xprt_put Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:35:37 +1100 Message-ID: <20100227123537.6289e326@notabene.brown> References: <19336.19524.469529.431210@notabene.brown> <20100226225416.GF26598@fieldses.org> <4B886A1A.7060106@opengridcomputing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Tom Tucker Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:37564 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966798Ab0B0Bfq (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:35:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B886A1A.7060106@opengridcomputing.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:40:58 -0600 Tom Tucker wrote: > J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 09:33:40AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > > >> [I found this while looking for the current refcount problem > >> that triggers a warning in svc_recv. This isn't that bug > >> but is a different refcount bug - NB] > >> > > > > > > I seem to recall that we added that reference for a reason. There was > an issue with unmount while there were deferrals pending. That's why the > reference was added. > > Tom What reference? What I (thought I) found was code that was dropping a reference which it didn't hold. Are you saying that it is supposed to be holding a reference here, but isn't, or that it really is holding a reference here and I didn't see it? And just for completeness, my understanding of the refcounting here is: A counted references is held on an svc_xprt when: - a 'struct rqst' refers to it through ->rq_xprt - a 'cache_deferred_req' refers to it through ->xprt This only happens while the req is waiting to be revisited, and is in the hash table and on the lru. Once the req gets revisited (svc_revisit) ->xprt is set to NULL and the reference is dropped. - XPT_DEAD is *not* set. So the refcount is initialised to '1' to reflect this, and this ref is dropped when we set XPT_DEAD. - there are a few transient references in svc_xprt.c which very clearly have matched 'get' and 'put'. - svc_find_xprt returns a counted reference. This is called once in lockd and once in nfsd, and both calls drop the ref correctly. Whenever we drop a counted ref that was stored in a pointer, we set that pointer to NULL. So if there was a race where two threads both get a reference from a pointer and then drop that reference, you would expect that slightly different timing would cause one of those threads to get a NULL from the pointer, dereference it, and crash. There are no important tests-for-NULL on either of the pointers in question, so that wouldn't be protecting us from a crash. But we don't see that crash, so there cannot be a race there. So: The refcount cannot possibly be zero in svc_recv :-) I just noticed some slightly odd code later in svc_recv: if (XPT_LISTENER && XPT_CLOSE) { ... } else if (XPT_CLOSE) { ... ->xpo_recvfrom() } if (XPT_CLOSE) { ... svc_delete_xprt() } So if XPT_CLOSE is set while xpo_recvfrom is being called, which I think is possible, and if ->xpo_recvfrom returns non-zero, then we end up processing a request on a dead socket, which doesn't sound like the right thing to do. I don't think it can cause the present problem, but it looks wrong. That last 'if' should just be an 'else'. I guess that would effectively reverse b0401d7253, though - not that that patch seems entirely right to me - if there is a problem I probably would have fixed it differently, though I'm not sure how. So maybe change "if (XPT_CLOSE)" to "if (len <= 0 && XPT_CLOSE)" ??? NeilBrown