From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] xfs_export_operations.commit_metadata Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:57:44 -0500 Message-ID: <20100210215744.GB25004@infradead.org> References: <20100210003220.6021.74943.stgit@case> <20100210003337.6021.10942.stgit@case> <20100210090750.GB21875@infradead.org> <20100210201527.GJ23654@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com To: bpm@sgi.com Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:44853 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751452Ab0BJV5p (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:57:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100210201527.GJ23654@sgi.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:15:27PM -0600, bpm@sgi.com wrote: > > Note that _xfs_log_force_lsn is new in the XFS tree, mainline still > > has _xfs_log_force with an lsn argument. > > I've been working with Bruce's tree. Not sure how best to handle that. Keep working against it for now, the merge fixup will be easy enough.