From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs_export_operations.commit_metadata Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:37:01 -0500 Message-ID: <20100212203701.GB28731@infradead.org> References: <20100211220454.26466.37578.stgit@case> <20100211220505.26466.99037.stgit@case> <1265986006.3201.112.camel@doink1> <20100212174706.GB22633@infradead.org> <20100212195647.GQ23654@sgi.com> <20100212200359.GA23361@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: bpm@sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , Alex Elder , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:37072 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757621Ab0BLUhC (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:37:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100212200359.GA23361@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 03:03:59PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > Assuming the xfs tree's something stable, I could also just go ahead and > pull it into the nfsd tree. > > (Or we could do it the other way around--as long as when the merge > window opens we try to send the pull requests in the same order.) The xfs tree is supposed to be stable and we only had very few incidents where a patch had to be pulled again. But it's also a quite large set of changes.