From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: Failure to fallback to nfsd-v3 (?) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:10:16 -0500 Message-ID: <20100207041016.GA16865@fieldses.org> References: <87pr4h67rf.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Neil Brown , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: OGAWA Hirofumi Return-path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:33005 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753324Ab0BGEJ6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:09:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pr4h67rf.fsf-x/W9pkDDSe1TgC2z9Sl/nXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 12:32:04PM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > Hi, > > I've recently noticed I couldn't mount nfs on 2.6.33-rc6. The environment is > > server (nfsd-v3, 2.6.33-rc6) <-> client (2.6.32.7, nfs-utils 1.2.1) > > And mount command is > > # mount server:/path /mntpoint > > (i.e. without any options. If I specified "vers=3" option, it works). > > With some debugging, it seems to change of the error code on nfsd - the > log of failure is the following. > > nfsd_dispatch: vers 4 proc 0 > nfsd_dispatch: vers 4 proc 1 > nfsv4 compound op #1/3: 24 (OP_PUTROOTFH) > nfsv4 compound op ffff88012d9e10c0 opcnt 3 #1: 24: status 30000 > nfsv4 compound returned 30000 > nfsd: Dropping request; may be revisited later > found domain *.xxx.xx > found fsidtype 1 > found fsid length 4 > Path seems to be <> > nfsd_dispatch: vers 4 proc 1 > nfsv4 compound op #1/3: 24 (OP_PUTROOTFH) > nfsv4 compound op ffff88012dab6228 opcnt 3 #1: 24: status 10006 > nfsv4 compound returned 10006 > > On the older kernel (2.6.32.7), it seems to fallback to nfsv3, > > nfsd_dispatch: vers 4 proc 0 > nfsd_dispatch: vers 4 proc 1 > nfsv4 compound op #1/3: 24 (OP_PUTROOTFH) > nfsv4 compound op d9c04850 opcnt 3 #1: 24: status 2 > nfsv4 compound returned 2 > nfsd_dispatch: vers 3 proc 0 > [...] > > > And the following commit seems to change the behavior. > > [nfsd4: fix error return when pseudoroot missing] > f39bde24b275ddc45df1ed835725b609e178c7a0 > > Well, anyway, is this a expected behavior change, or something bug? It's expected. I'd recommend turning off nfsv4 on the server (add "-N4" to the rpc.nfsd commandline) for now. --b.