From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Failure to fallback to nfsd-v3 (?) Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 03:31:03 -0500 Message-ID: <20100207083103.GA4602@infradead.org> References: <87pr4h67rf.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <20100207041016.GA16865@fieldses.org> <8763695u96.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Neil Brown , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: OGAWA Hirofumi Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:46653 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752335Ab0BGIbI (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2010 03:31:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8763695u96.fsf-x/W9pkDDSe1TgC2z9Sl/nXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 05:23:49PM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > "J. Bruce Fields" writes: > > >> And the following commit seems to change the behavior. > >> > >> [nfsd4: fix error return when pseudoroot missing] > >> f39bde24b275ddc45df1ed835725b609e178c7a0 > >> > >> Well, anyway, is this a expected behavior change, or something bug? > > > > It's expected. I'd recommend turning off nfsv4 on the server (add "-N4" > > to the rpc.nfsd commandline) for now. > > This looks like the silent user visible change. So, it would be better > to add more comment at least in changelog. Or rather it should be fixed. We should not silently break existing and probably rather common setups.