From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: NFSv3/NFSv4 problem. Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:52:57 -0500 Message-ID: <20100302175257.GI5553@fieldses.org> References: <20100302171614.GH5553@fieldses.org> <0A63A1BA-F749-4CFF-B77D-98AEFC531035@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Anton Starikov Return-path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:50810 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753102Ab0CBRvs (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:51:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <0A63A1BA-F749-4CFF-B77D-98AEFC531035@gmail.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 06:20:43PM +0100, Anton Starikov wrote: > > On Mar 2, 2010, at 6:16 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 04:01:42PM +0100, Anton Starikov wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> my config is diskless NFSv3 nfsroot (+ some extra NFDSv3 mounts) and NFSv4 /home/* automount. > >> Centos 5.4, kernel 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5. > > > > That's the client? What's the server? > > Server is Opensolaris. > > > That's pretty old kernel; I'd file a bug with CentOS. > > Unfortunately, with newer kernels this setup is even more problematic. :) Any details? As a rule, this list is probably going to be a better place to handle bugs with the latest upstream kernels, and your distributor is more likely to be useful for their kernels. --b. > > >> > >> What kind of information I have to collect from system to figure out what it real problem? > > > > Is there any server-side logging? > > Can you see any interesting network traffic after the hang? > > It always unfortunate, but last couple of days I can't get a hang :) Although nothing changed in setup, so it will happen anyway. > > > Anton. >