From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: Merge {nfsv4,pnfs}@linux-nfs.org with
 linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org?
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:33:04 -0400
Message-ID: <1272393184.3067.27.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <4BD729A2.3000805@panasas.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: pNFS Mailing List <pnfs@linux-nfs.org>,
	nfsv4 <nfsv4@linux-nfs.org>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>,
	NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
To: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
Return-path: <linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:6918 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752355Ab0D0SdI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:33:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4BD729A2.3000805@panasas.com>
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org>


> On Apr. 27, 2010, 21:10 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu> wrote:
> So, looking back at what we did for the sourceforge list:
> 
> 	- We added something to the footer saying the list is
> 	  deprecated.  (But if we wanted to be more obnoxious, we could
> 	  add it to the top of each message.)
> 
> 	- We subscribed the new list (linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org) to the
> 	  old list, I guess so newbie bug reports sent to the old list
> 	  wouldn't get lost.
> 
> Anyone want to object to starting that process for nfsv4@linux-nfs.org?
> What about pnfs@linux-nfs.org?

ACK to both...