From: Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: Merge {nfsv4,pnfs}@linux-nfs.org with linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org? Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:36:57 -0400 Message-ID: <1272393417.3067.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <4BD729A2.3000805@panasas.com> <1272393184.3067.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: pNFS Mailing List , nfsv4 , "J. Bruce Fields" , NFS list To: Benny Halevy Return-path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:62901 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753711Ab0D0Sg7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:36:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1272393184.3067.27.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 14:33 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Apr. 27, 2010, 21:10 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > > So, looking back at what we did for the sourceforge list: > > > > - We added something to the footer saying the list is > > deprecated. (But if we wanted to be more obnoxious, we could > > add it to the top of each message.) > > > > - We subscribed the new list (linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org) to the > > old list, I guess so newbie bug reports sent to the old list > > wouldn't get lost. > > > > Anyone want to object to starting that process for nfsv4@linux-nfs.org? > > What about pnfs@linux-nfs.org? > > ACK to both... > > Oh... The other thing to do is to turn off moderation. I'm sure that Bruce and I have better things to do than to act as spam filters on legacy mailing lists...