From: Guillaume Rousse Subject: Re: trouble using kerberos between linux client and server Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 11:09:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4BEBC1B0.8030502@inria.fr> References: <4BCFE979.2000406@inria.fr> <4BE1E099.9050902@inria.fr> <4BEB1FA2.1060001@inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Coffman Return-path: Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]:17395 "EHLO mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752915Ab0EMJJH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2010 05:09:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 13/05/2010 01:21, Kevin Coffman a =E9crit : > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Guillaume Rousse > wrote: >> Le 05/05/2010 23:18, Guillaume Rousse a =E9crit : >>> I'm attaching network capture, even I can't figure additional >>> information from it by myself. >> Reading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D562807, I rebu= ild >> libtirpc with patch applied and -DDEBUG. Unfortunatly, it doesn't br= ing >> additional information about the server-side failure :( >=20 > It looks to me like fflush(), called in qword_eol(), may be returning > the number of bytes flushed (95) rather than zero for success? I > don't immediately see any changes that would cause this. But I > haven't looked extensively... Not necessarily a change: I never used a kerberized server sofar, only clients. --=20 BOFH excuse #164: root rot