From: Jeff Layton Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] nfsd: just keep single lockd reference for nfsd (try #4) Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:40:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20100722134026.62091dc2@barsoom.rdu.redhat.com> References: <1279718501-6834-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> <20100721201437.GD28123@fieldses.org> <20100721232432.GA6689@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17903 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758927Ab0GVRke (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:40:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100721232432.GA6689@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:24:32 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 04:14:37PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > (Incremental on top of your last patch, with some noise due to moving > > stuff around to avoid forward references. I'll clean these up and > > resend.) > > > > Then we could also get rid of some of the individual flags (nfs4_init at > > least), I think. > > Here's what I'm thinking of applying. (Lightly tested.) > I gave them some basic smoke testing and looked them over and they seem to be ok. Unfortunately, I don't really have an exhaustive test for this sort of thing, but it does seem to fix the problem that was originally reported to me. -- Jeff Layton