From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] nfsd: just keep single lockd reference for nfsd (try #4) Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:55:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20100723125528.GB20839@fieldses.org> References: <1279718501-6834-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> <20100721201437.GD28123@fieldses.org> <20100721232432.GA6689@fieldses.org> <20100722134026.62091dc2@barsoom.rdu.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Layton Return-path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:52113 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757709Ab0GWM4S (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:56:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100722134026.62091dc2-xSBYVWDuneFaJnirhKH9O4GKTjYczspe@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 01:40:26PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:24:32 -0400 > "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 04:14:37PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > (Incremental on top of your last patch, with some noise due to moving > > > stuff around to avoid forward references. I'll clean these up and > > > resend.) > > > > > > Then we could also get rid of some of the individual flags (nfs4_init at > > > least), I think. > > > > Here's what I'm thinking of applying. (Lightly tested.) > > > > I gave them some basic smoke testing and looked them over and they seem > to be ok. Unfortunately, I don't really have an exhaustive test for > this sort of thing, but it does seem to fix the problem that > was originally reported to me. I also experimented a little with bringing nfs and rpcbind up and down and didn't see any problems. Applied for 2.6.36. --b.