From: "William A. (Andy) Adamson" Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] SQUASHME pnfs-submit embed pnfs_layout_type Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:34:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1278542063-4009-1-git-send-email-andros@netapp.com> <1278542063-4009-2-git-send-email-andros@netapp.com> <1278542063-4009-3-git-send-email-andros@netapp.com> <1278542063-4009-4-git-send-email-andros@netapp.com> <4C3B42FD.1070809@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: bhalevy@panasas.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:50989 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751203Ab0GLRe2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:34:28 -0400 Received: by pwi5 with SMTP id 5so1916191pwi.19 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:34:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C3B42FD.1070809@panasas.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 07/08/2010 01:34 AM, andros@netapp.com wrote: >> From: Andy Adamson >> >> Change nfs_inode layout field to a pointer >> >> Each layoutdriver embeds the pnfs_layout_type in it's private layout cache >> head structure, and allocates them both with the alloc_layout >> layoutdriver_io_operation. >> >> NOTE API change: the layoutdriver_io_operation alloc_layout and free_layout now >> use pnfs_layout_type pointers instead of void*. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson >> --- >> fs/nfs/callback_proc.c | 2 +- >> fs/nfs/inode.c | 12 +----- >> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 2 +- >> fs/nfs/nfs4state.c | 4 +- >> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- >> include/linux/nfs4_pnfs.h | 19 +++----- >> include/linux/nfs_fs.h | 4 +- >> 7 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c >> index 4766695..d999ea8 100644 >> --- a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c >> +++ b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c >> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static int pnfs_recall_layout(void *data) >> rl.cbl_seg.length = NFS4_MAX_UINT64; >> >> if (rl.cbl_recall_type == RETURN_FILE) { >> - if (pnfs_is_next_layout_stateid(&NFS_I(inode)->layout, >> + if (pnfs_is_next_layout_stateid(NFS_I(inode)->layout, >> rl.cbl_stateid)) >> status = pnfs_return_layout(inode, &rl.cbl_seg, >> &rl.cbl_stateid, RETURN_FILE, >> diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c >> index 3d51602..30252f4 100644 >> --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c >> +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c >> @@ -1397,17 +1397,7 @@ static inline void nfs4_init_once(struct nfs_inode *nfsi) >> #ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 >> init_waitqueue_head(&nfsi->lo_waitq); >> nfsi->pnfs_layout_suspend = 0; >> - seqlock_init(&nfsi->layout.seqlock); >> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfsi->layout.lo_layouts); >> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfsi->layout.segs); >> - nfsi->layout.refcount = 0; >> - nfsi->layout.ld_data = NULL; >> - nfsi->layout.pnfs_layout_state = 0; >> - memset(&nfsi->layout.stateid, 0, NFS4_STATEID_SIZE); >> - nfsi->layout.roc_iomode = 0; >> - nfsi->layout.lo_cred = NULL; >> - nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_begin_pos = 0; >> - nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_end_pos = 0; >> + nfsi->layout = NULL; >> #endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */ >> #endif >> } >> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c >> index c5b8a2f..6acebc3 100644 >> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c >> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c >> @@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ static void pnfs4_layout_reclaim(struct nfs4_state *state) >> * flag during grace period >> */ >> pnfs_destroy_layout(NFS_I(state->inode)); >> - pnfs_set_layout_stateid(&NFS_I(state->inode)->layout, &zero_stateid); >> + pnfs_set_layout_stateid(NFS_I(state->inode)->layout, &zero_stateid); >> #endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */ >> } >> >> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c >> index bfe679b..6f44cb0 100644 >> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c >> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c >> @@ -597,10 +597,10 @@ static void __nfs4_close(struct path *path, struct nfs4_state *state, >> #ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 >> struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(state->inode); >> >> - if (has_layout(nfsi) && nfsi->layout.roc_iomode) { >> + if (has_layout(nfsi) && nfsi->layout->roc_iomode) { >> struct nfs4_pnfs_layout_segment range; >> >> - range.iomode = nfsi->layout.roc_iomode; >> + range.iomode = nfsi->layout->roc_iomode; >> range.offset = 0; >> range.length = NFS4_MAX_UINT64; >> pnfs_return_layout(state->inode, &range, NULL, >> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c >> index 53c15b1..6d435ed 100644 >> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c >> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c >> @@ -152,10 +152,11 @@ pnfs_need_layoutcommit(struct nfs_inode *nfsi, struct nfs_open_context *ctx) >> { >> dprintk("%s: has_layout=%d ctx=%p\n", __func__, has_layout(nfsi), ctx); >> spin_lock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock); >> - if (has_layout(nfsi) && !layoutcommit_needed(nfsi)) { >> - nfsi->layout.lo_cred = get_rpccred(ctx->state->owner->so_cred); >> + if (has_layout(nfsi) && ! >> + !test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->layout->pnfs_layout_state)) { > > Is the "!!" intended No! :) > > Why did you open code layoutcommit_needed() ? Because I added a has_layout test to the layoutcommit_needed, and so can't use !layoutcommit_needed. > >> + nfsi->layout->lo_cred = get_rpccred(ctx->state->owner->so_cred); >> __set_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, >> - &nfsi->layout.pnfs_layout_state); >> + &nfsi->layout->pnfs_layout_state); >> nfsi->change_attr++; >> spin_unlock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock); >> dprintk("%s: Set layoutcommit\n", __func__); >> @@ -175,17 +176,17 @@ pnfs_update_last_write(struct nfs_inode *nfsi, loff_t offset, size_t extent) >> loff_t end_pos; >> >> spin_lock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock); >> - if (offset < nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_begin_pos) >> - nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_begin_pos = offset; >> + if (offset < nfsi->layout->pnfs_write_begin_pos) >> + nfsi->layout->pnfs_write_begin_pos = offset; >> end_pos = offset + extent - 1; /* I'm being inclusive */ >> - if (end_pos > nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_end_pos) >> - nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_end_pos = end_pos; >> + if (end_pos > nfsi->layout->pnfs_write_end_pos) >> + nfsi->layout->pnfs_write_end_pos = end_pos; >> dprintk("%s: Wrote %lu@%lu bpos %lu, epos: %lu\n", >> __func__, >> (unsigned long) extent, >> (unsigned long) offset , >> - (unsigned long) nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_begin_pos, >> - (unsigned long) nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_end_pos); >> + (unsigned long) nfsi->layout->pnfs_write_begin_pos, >> + (unsigned long) nfsi->layout->pnfs_write_end_pos); >> spin_unlock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock); >> } >> >> @@ -326,10 +327,9 @@ get_layout(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo) >> static inline struct pnfs_layout_type * >> grab_current_layout(struct nfs_inode *nfsi) >> { >> - struct pnfs_layout_type *lo = &nfsi->layout; >> + struct pnfs_layout_type *lo = nfsi->layout; >> >> - BUG_ON_UNLOCKED_LO(lo); >> - if (!lo->ld_data) >> + if (!lo) >> return NULL; >> get_layout(lo); >> return lo; >> @@ -343,13 +343,13 @@ put_layout(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo) >> >> lo->refcount--; >> if (!lo->refcount) { >> - struct layoutdriver_io_operations *io_ops = >> - PNFS_LD_IO_OPS(lo); >> + struct layoutdriver_io_operations *io_ops = PNFS_LD_IO_OPS(lo); >> + struct nfs_inode *nfsi = PNFS_NFS_INODE(lo); >> >> - dprintk("%s: freeing layout %p\n", __func__, lo->ld_data); >> + dprintk("%s: freeing layout cache %p\n", __func__, lo); >> WARN_ON(!list_empty(&lo->lo_layouts)); >> - io_ops->free_layout(lo->ld_data); >> - lo->ld_data = NULL; >> + io_ops->free_layout(lo); >> + nfsi->layout = NULL; >> } >> } >> >> @@ -381,14 +381,13 @@ pnfs_destroy_layout(struct nfs_inode *nfsi) >> lo = grab_current_layout(nfsi); >> if (lo) { >> pnfs_free_layout(lo, &range); >> - WARN_ON(!list_empty(&nfsi->layout.segs)); >> - WARN_ON(!list_empty(&nfsi->layout.lo_layouts)); >> - WARN_ON(nfsi->layout.ld_data); >> + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&nfsi->layout->segs)); >> + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&nfsi->layout->lo_layouts)); >> >> - if (nfsi->layout.refcount != 1) >> + if (nfsi->layout->refcount != 1) >> printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: layout refcount not=1 %d\n", >> - __func__, nfsi->layout.refcount); >> - WARN_ON(nfsi->layout.refcount != 1); >> + __func__, nfsi->layout->refcount); >> + WARN_ON(nfsi->layout->refcount != 1); >> >> put_layout(lo); >> } >> @@ -698,7 +697,7 @@ pnfs_return_layout_barrier(struct nfs_inode *nfsi, >> bool ret = false; >> >> spin_lock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock); >> - list_for_each_entry (lseg, &nfsi->layout.segs, fi_list) { >> + list_for_each_entry(lseg, &nfsi->layout->segs, fi_list) { >> if (!should_free_lseg(lseg, range)) >> continue; >> lseg->valid = false; >> @@ -904,29 +903,33 @@ pnfs_insert_layout(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo, >> dprintk("%s:Return\n", __func__); >> } >> >> +/* >> + * Each layoutdriver embeds pnfs_layout_type as the first field in it's >> + * per-layout type layout cache structure and returns it ZEROed >> + * from layoutdriver_io_ops->alloc_layout >> + */ >> static struct pnfs_layout_type * >> alloc_init_layout(struct inode *ino) >> { >> - void *ld_data; >> struct pnfs_layout_type *lo; >> struct layoutdriver_io_operations *io_ops; >> >> + BUG_ON(NFS_I(ino)->layout != NULL); >> io_ops = NFS_SERVER(ino)->pnfs_curr_ld->ld_io_ops; >> - lo = &NFS_I(ino)->layout; >> - ld_data = io_ops->alloc_layout(ino); >> - if (!ld_data) { >> + lo = io_ops->alloc_layout(ino); >> + if (!lo) { >> printk(KERN_ERR >> "%s: out of memory: io_ops->alloc_layout failed\n", >> __func__); >> return NULL; >> } >> - >> spin_lock(&ino->i_lock); >> - BUG_ON(lo->ld_data != NULL); >> - lo->ld_data = ld_data; >> - memset(&lo->stateid, 0, NFS4_STATEID_SIZE); >> lo->refcount = 1; >> - lo->roc_iomode = 0; >> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lo->lo_layouts); >> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lo->segs); >> + seqlock_init(&lo->seqlock); >> + lo->lo_inode = ino; > > > The spin_lock() could be moved to here, it's the single place > that actually touches the nfsi. True, but it gets moved in 'pnfs-submti rewrite layout allocation" > >> + NFS_I(ino)->layout = lo; >> spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock); >> return lo; >> } >> @@ -961,7 +964,7 @@ get_lock_alloc_layout(struct inode *ino) >> * wait until bit is cleared if we lost this race. >> */ >> res = wait_on_bit_lock( >> - &nfsi->layout.pnfs_layout_state, >> + &nfsi->layout->pnfs_layout_state, >> NFS_INO_LAYOUT_ALLOC, >> pnfs_wait_schedule, TASK_KILLABLE); >> if (res) { >> @@ -972,7 +975,7 @@ get_lock_alloc_layout(struct inode *ino) >> /* Was current_layout already allocated while we slept? >> * If so, retry get_lock'ing it. Otherwise, allocate it. >> */ >> - if (nfsi->layout.ld_data) { >> + if (nfsi->layout) { >> spin_lock(&ino->i_lock); >> continue; >> } >> @@ -985,8 +988,8 @@ get_lock_alloc_layout(struct inode *ino) >> >> /* release the NFS_INO_LAYOUT_ALLOC bit and wake up waiters */ >> clear_bit_unlock(NFS_INO_LAYOUT_ALLOC, >> - &nfsi->layout.pnfs_layout_state); >> - wake_up_bit(&nfsi->layout.pnfs_layout_state, >> + &nfsi->layout->pnfs_layout_state); >> + wake_up_bit(&nfsi->layout->pnfs_layout_state, >> NFS_INO_LAYOUT_ALLOC); >> break; >> } >> @@ -1113,12 +1116,12 @@ _pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino, >> } >> >> /* if get layout already failed once goto out */ >> - if (test_bit(lo_fail_bit(iomode), &nfsi->layout.pnfs_layout_state)) { >> + if (test_bit(lo_fail_bit(iomode), &nfsi->layout->pnfs_layout_state)) { >> if (unlikely(nfsi->pnfs_layout_suspend && >> get_seconds() >= nfsi->pnfs_layout_suspend)) { >> dprintk("%s: layout_get resumed\n", __func__); >> clear_bit(lo_fail_bit(iomode), >> - &nfsi->layout.pnfs_layout_state); >> + &nfsi->layout->pnfs_layout_state); >> nfsi->pnfs_layout_suspend = 0; >> } else >> goto out_put; >> @@ -1130,7 +1133,7 @@ _pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino, >> send_layoutget(ino, ctx, &arg, lsegpp, lo); >> out: >> dprintk("%s end, state 0x%lx lseg %p\n", __func__, >> - nfsi->layout.pnfs_layout_state, lseg); >> + nfsi->layout->pnfs_layout_state, lseg); >> return; >> out_put: >> if (lsegpp) >> @@ -1235,12 +1238,12 @@ pnfs_get_layout_done(struct nfs4_pnfs_layoutget *lgp, int rpc_status) >> /* remember that get layout failed and suspend trying */ >> nfsi->pnfs_layout_suspend = suspend; >> set_bit(lo_fail_bit(lgp->args.lseg.iomode), >> - &nfsi->layout.pnfs_layout_state); >> + &nfsi->layout->pnfs_layout_state); >> dprintk("%s: layout_get suspended until %ld\n", >> __func__, suspend); >> out: >> dprintk("%s end (err:%d) state 0x%lx lseg %p\n", >> - __func__, lgp->status, nfsi->layout.pnfs_layout_state, lseg); >> + __func__, lgp->status, nfsi->layout->pnfs_layout_state, lseg); >> return; >> } >> >> @@ -1321,7 +1324,7 @@ pnfs_set_pg_test(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *pgio) >> >> pgio->pg_test = NULL; >> >> - laytype = &NFS_I(inode)->layout; >> + laytype = NFS_I(inode)->layout; >> ld = NFS_SERVER(inode)->pnfs_curr_ld; >> if (!pnfs_enabled_sb(NFS_SERVER(inode)) || !laytype) >> return; >> @@ -1454,7 +1457,7 @@ pnfs_writepages(struct nfs_write_data *wdata, int how) >> numpages); >> wdata->pdata.lseg = lseg; >> trypnfs = nfss->pnfs_curr_ld->ld_io_ops->write_pagelist( >> - &nfsi->layout, >> + nfsi->layout, >> args->pages, >> args->pgbase, >> numpages, >> @@ -1507,7 +1510,7 @@ pnfs_readpages(struct nfs_read_data *rdata) >> __func__, numpages); >> rdata->pdata.lseg = lseg; >> trypnfs = nfss->pnfs_curr_ld->ld_io_ops->read_pagelist( >> - &nfsi->layout, >> + nfsi->layout, >> args->pages, >> args->pgbase, >> numpages, >> @@ -1568,7 +1571,7 @@ pnfs_commit(struct nfs_write_data *data, int sync) >> * This will be done by passing the buck to the layout driver. >> */ >> data->pdata.lseg = NULL; >> - trypnfs = nfss->pnfs_curr_ld->ld_io_ops->commit(&nfsi->layout, >> + trypnfs = nfss->pnfs_curr_ld->ld_io_ops->commit(nfsi->layout, >> sync, data); >> dprintk("%s End (trypnfs:%d)\n", __func__, trypnfs); >> return trypnfs; >> @@ -1639,14 +1642,14 @@ pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(struct inode *inode, int sync) >> /* Clear layoutcommit properties in the inode so >> * new lc info can be generated >> */ >> - write_begin_pos = nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_begin_pos; >> - write_end_pos = nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_end_pos; >> - data->cred = nfsi->layout.lo_cred; >> - nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_begin_pos = 0; >> - nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_end_pos = 0; >> - nfsi->layout.lo_cred = NULL; >> - __clear_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->layout.pnfs_layout_state); >> - pnfs_get_layout_stateid(&data->args.stateid, &nfsi->layout); >> + write_begin_pos = nfsi->layout->pnfs_write_begin_pos; >> + write_end_pos = nfsi->layout->pnfs_write_end_pos; >> + data->cred = nfsi->layout->lo_cred; >> + nfsi->layout->pnfs_write_begin_pos = 0; >> + nfsi->layout->pnfs_write_end_pos = 0; >> + nfsi->layout->lo_cred = NULL; >> + __clear_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->layout->pnfs_layout_state); >> + pnfs_get_layout_stateid(&data->args.stateid, nfsi->layout); >> >> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs4_pnfs.h b/include/linux/nfs4_pnfs.h >> index c5af82f..2c6ce4c 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/nfs4_pnfs.h >> +++ b/include/linux/nfs4_pnfs.h >> @@ -35,13 +35,13 @@ struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type { >> static inline struct nfs_inode * >> PNFS_NFS_INODE(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo) >> { >> - return container_of(lo, struct nfs_inode, layout); >> + return NFS_I(lo->lo_inode); >> } >> >> static inline struct inode * >> PNFS_INODE(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo) >> { >> - return &PNFS_NFS_INODE(lo)->vfs_inode; >> + return lo->lo_inode; >> } >> >> static inline struct nfs_server * >> @@ -50,12 +50,6 @@ PNFS_NFS_SERVER(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo) >> return NFS_SERVER(PNFS_INODE(lo)); >> } >> >> -static inline void * >> -PNFS_LD_DATA(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo) >> -{ >> - return lo->ld_data; >> -} >> - >> static inline struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type * >> PNFS_LD(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo) >> { >> @@ -77,13 +71,14 @@ PNFS_LD_POLICY_OPS(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo) >> static inline bool >> has_layout(struct nfs_inode *nfsi) >> { >> - return nfsi->layout.ld_data != NULL; >> + return nfsi->layout != NULL; > > does this mean the same thing now? Yes, the pnfs_layout_type and the ld_data are allocated together. > > You could perhaps optimize with a bit flag that is set on > first segment insert, and reset on last segment removal. > Or some other/better scheme. Are you suggesting adding a bit flag to nfs_inode, or perhaps moving the pnfs_layout_state back to the nfs_inode? > >> } >> >> static inline bool >> layoutcommit_needed(struct nfs_inode *nfsi) >> { >> - return test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->layout.pnfs_layout_state); >> + return has_layout(nfsi) && >> + test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->layout->pnfs_layout_state); > > What is the purpose of patch[1/1] ? To not segfault when the nfs_inode->layout field is NULL. > > you are unlocked and asking about a layout pointer. Which according to you might > go away mid-flight? No, it simply has not been allocated. The pnfs_layout_type reference counting will be done under the inode->i_lock and all in-flight RPC's will hold a reference, so there is no reason to hold a lock to call has_layout(). -->Andy > >> } >> >> #else /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */ >> @@ -149,8 +144,8 @@ struct layoutdriver_io_operations { >> /* Layout information. For each inode, alloc_layout is executed once to retrieve an >> * inode specific layout structure. Each subsequent layoutget operation results in >> * a set_layout call to set the opaque layout in the layout driver.*/ >> - void * (*alloc_layout) (struct inode *inode); >> - void (*free_layout) (void *layoutid); >> + struct pnfs_layout_type * (*alloc_layout) (struct inode *inode); >> + void (*free_layout) (struct pnfs_layout_type *); >> struct pnfs_layout_segment * (*alloc_lseg) (struct pnfs_layout_type *layoutid, struct nfs4_pnfs_layoutget_res *lgr); >> void (*free_lseg) (struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg); >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h >> index b612746..7b999a4 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h >> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h >> @@ -104,7 +104,6 @@ struct pnfs_layout_type { >> int roc_iomode; /* iomode to return on close, 0=none */ >> seqlock_t seqlock; /* Protects the stateid */ >> nfs4_stateid stateid; >> - void *ld_data; /* layout driver private data */ >> unsigned long pnfs_layout_state; >> #define NFS_INO_RO_LAYOUT_FAILED 0 /* get ro layout failed stop trying */ >> #define NFS_INO_RW_LAYOUT_FAILED 1 /* get rw layout failed stop trying */ >> @@ -116,6 +115,7 @@ struct pnfs_layout_type { >> */ >> loff_t pnfs_write_begin_pos; >> loff_t pnfs_write_end_pos; >> + struct inode *lo_inode; >> }; >> >> /* >> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ struct nfs_inode { >> /* pNFS layout information */ >> #if defined(CONFIG_NFS_V4_1) >> wait_queue_head_t lo_waitq; >> - struct pnfs_layout_type layout; >> + struct pnfs_layout_type *layout; >> time_t pnfs_layout_suspend; >> #endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */ >> #endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4*/ > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >