Return-Path: <linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from magus.merit.edu ([198.108.1.13]:43050 "EHLO magus.merit.edu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754376Ab0HLP4B (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:56:01 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by magus.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E49225674
	for <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:56:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from magus.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (magus.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id JTlNczg72BaU for <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>;
	Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:56:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from merit.edu (manihiki.merit.edu [198.108.60.79])
	by magus.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AA842253D1
	for <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:56:00 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:56:00 -0400
From: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux pNFS status meeting 08/12
Message-ID: <20100812155600.GC10037@merit.edu>
References: <OFED8B9B7B.45CD28BB-ON8825777C.005B88F3-8825777C.005BC3F5@us.ibm.com>
 <20100811172959.GA16603@fieldses.org>
 <4C632BC2.6020305@RedHat.com>
 <4C64127B.2060804@panasas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <4C64127B.2060804@panasas.com>
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0

Benny Halevy wrote:

  Given the low attendance rate, shall we just skip the call this week?

I'll be around but am happy to skip it.  The only thing I wanted to bring up
was divergence between pnfs-all-latest and linux.org mainline, and plans and
timetables for pushing upstream.  I've brought this up before but was hoping
for an update.