Return-Path: Received: from lvps87-230-0-242.dedicated.hosteurope.de ([87.230.0.242]:46960 "EHLO lvps87-230-0-242.dedicated.hosteurope.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751562Ab0HRF3h (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:29:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:29:28 +0200 From: Michael Guntsche To: Trond Myklebust Cc: linux-nfs Subject: Re: Page alloc error on nfs4 via automount Message-ID: <20100818052928.GA17829@gibson.comsick.at> References: <20100816061644.GA2401@gibson.comsick.at> <1282087292.18385.34.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1282087292.18385.34.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On 17 Aug 10 19:21, Trond Myklebust wrote: > It looks like a regression in the Linux kernel memory management. > > I agree that order 4 allocations are always going to be unreliable, but > if it was consistently working before, and is now consistently not > working, then something must have changed, and I know that part of the > NFS code has not changed... Hello, Just to clarify this. The setup with automount adn NFS4 is new so I while the NFS3 setup is working for years now. I never experience this with NFS3 so it may be a NFS4 only problem. As you can see from the mails I am not the only one having the problem with version 4 in this regard. I think setups with automount and version 3 are much more common so a regression there would have been noticed a lot faster. Kind regards, Michael