From: "Patrick J. LoPresti" <lopresti@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Use hi-res clock for file timestamps
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 09:45:11 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTinqHKvN_2rApcBe4+8gLSBbPJdCAAFy9GRO9Jj3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimnyXKahtjaFeSsgcq=xMy-pP3na1jidQhZ-dt2@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin2P5kcrC1SU-ANffSHyW8Ar4x4+qFuqVMFhYJE@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin-dksybH0ANypheovXXubwd+SRCpurdVRU7-Z=@mail.gmail.com>
	<1281726579.2810.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<AANLkTinJ04d2Bjuv2E4OOG=35TSHArEP6cHqGUQVUoy2@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinJ04d2Bjuv2E4OOG=35TSHArEP6cHqGUQVUoy2@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Patrick J. LoPresti <lopresti@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Consider the following "revision 2" of my proposal:
>

In case I was not clear...

I am volunteering to implement this myself, but only if there is a
realistic chance my patches will be accepted.

 - Pat