Return-Path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:41694 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752485Ab0IWVGM (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:06:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:04:40 -0400 To: Olga Kornievskaia Cc: linux-nfs Subject: Re: question about nfs41 features Message-ID: <20100923210440.GC14610@fieldses.org> References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: From: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:30:49PM -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: > I would greatly appreciate it I can get a reply from NFS41 server > implementers out there on the subject of whether or not the following > feature are (a) currently implemented by your server, (b) will be > implemented soon (1year), (c) having interest in being implemented > within the next few years and (d) are so low in priority that could be > said: will never be implemented. This could change depending on interest, of course, but: > volatile handles > named attributes Probably both (d). > directory delegations > SSV I'm guessing (c) or (d). (I'd be happier if SSV were a higher priority, but oh well.) > trunking (session or clientid) (b) > segmented file layouts > > recall of file layouts > cb_notify_deviceid Not sure. > cb_getattr (c) > cb_recall_slot > cb_notify_lock Probably both (c). This list doesn't necessarily get you anyone other than linux implementors, so you may want to ask on nfsv4@ietf.org or ask people at the bakeathon. --b.