From: Olga Kornievskaia Subject: Re: question about nfs41 features Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:09:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20100923210440.GC14610@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linux-nfs To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:41089 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755635Ab0IWVJD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:09:03 -0400 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so185342wwd.1 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:09:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100923210440.GC14610@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:04 PM, J. Bruce Fields = wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:30:49PM -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: >> I would greatly appreciate it I can get a reply from NFS41 server >> implementers out there on the subject of whether or not the followin= g >> feature are (a) currently implemented by your server, (b) will be >> implemented soon (1year), (c) having interest in being implemented >> within the next few years and (d) are so low in priority that could = be >> said: will never be implemented. > > This could change depending on interest, of course, but: > >> volatile handles >> named attributes > > Probably both (d). > >> directory delegations >> SSV > > I'm guessing (c) or (d). =A0(I'd be happier if SSV were a higher prio= rity, > but oh well.) > >> trunking (session or clientid) > > (b) > >> segmented file layouts >> >> recall of file layouts >> cb_notify_deviceid > > Not sure. > >> cb_getattr > > (c) > >> cb_recall_slot >> cb_notify_lock > > Probably both (c). > > This list doesn't necessarily get you anyone other than linux > implementors, so you may want to ask on nfsv4@ietf.org or ask people = at > the bakeathon. Thank you Bruce. Thomas Haynes has also pointed this mistake out to me and I posted to the ietf list.