Return-Path: Received: from magus.merit.edu ([198.108.1.13]:34674 "EHLO magus.merit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751187Ab0JMM5C (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:57:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:56:56 -0400 From: Jim Rees To: Valentijn Sessink Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ipv6 + krb5, server status? Message-ID: <20101013125656.GA5197@merit.edu> References: <4CB59086.9080108@blub.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4CB59086.9080108@blub.net> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Valentijn Sessink wrote: Hello list, I found a lot of information on the subject NFS server, ipv6 + krb5, but not anything conclusive. So I tried it out; I got IPv6 + NFS4 to work, but only with sec=sys. When using sec=krb5, there seemed to be errors in gssd communication. (Ubuntu 10.04 with rpcbind instead of portmap; with nfs-utils-1.2.3 from nfs.sf.net, and with a 2.6.35-020635rc1-generic kernel package). Is this correct, i.e. svcgssd still needs to be adapted to IPv6? Or should NFS-server/IPv6/Kerberos on Linux just work, i.e. should I re-check my configuration? I don't know the specific answer to your question, but ipv6 support is still a work in progress, and I'm actually a bit surprised it works out of the box even with sec=sys. You may want to try the very latest ipv6 version of nfs-utils, which may have some patches that have not yet been merged upstream. You can get it from git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/cel/nfs-utils.git . The usual warnings apply, this is experimental code, you could lose data, it may not work with your 2.6.35 kernel, and if you find bugs you can't necessarily get anyone to help you.