Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13456 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752131Ab0JMMzx (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:55:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:56:28 -0400 From: Jeff Layton To: Valentijn Sessink Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ipv6 + krb5, server status? Message-ID: <20101013085628.58f568d7@corrin.poochiereds.net> In-Reply-To: <4CB59086.9080108@blub.net> References: <4CB59086.9080108@blub.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:57:10 +0200 Valentijn Sessink wrote: > Hello list, > > I found a lot of information on the subject NFS server, ipv6 + krb5, but > not anything conclusive. So I tried it out; I got IPv6 + > NFS4 to work, but only with sec=sys. > > When using sec=krb5, there seemed to be errors in gssd communication. > (Ubuntu 10.04 with rpcbind instead of portmap; with nfs-utils-1.2.3 from > nfs.sf.net, and with a 2.6.35-020635rc1-generic kernel package). > > Is this correct, i.e. svcgssd still needs to be adapted to IPv6? Or > should NFS-server/IPv6/Kerberos on Linux just work, i.e. should I > re-check my configuration? > > Best regards, > > Valentijn Sessink > When I last tested it and reviewed it (which was quite some time ago), it worked without any issues. rpc.svcgssd doesn't really do much with addresses, so it didn't need anything to convert it to IPv6. What sort of problems were you having? -- Jeff Layton