Return-Path: Received: from filter.openoffice.nl ([217.170.2.175]:35181 "EHLO filter.openoffice.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752099Ab0JMN4i (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:56:38 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filter.openoffice.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E81243FF9 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:56:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from filter.openoffice.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (post-it.openoffice.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ULDR4VqVINrr for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:56:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blub.net (095-097-076-243.static.chello.nl [95.97.76.243]) by filter.openoffice.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FD92439F2 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:56:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from stout.kantoor.openoffice.nl (stout.kantoor.openoffice.nl [192.168.112.50]) by blub.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5D0300052 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:56:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4CB5BA8F.2090608@blub.net> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:56:31 +0200 From: Valentijn Sessink To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ipv6 + krb5, server status? References: <4CB59086.9080108@blub.net> <20101013125656.GA5197@merit.edu> <20101013095216.5b9b31a7@corrin.poochiereds.net> In-Reply-To: <20101013095216.5b9b31a7@corrin.poochiereds.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Jeff Layton schreef: > As of nfs-utils-1.2.3, IPv6 server-side support should be > "complete" (modulo bugs, of course). Which is "correct" (I copied the quotation marks, because I tested very inextensively). What I'm wondering about is the combination with Kerberos. I'm currently setting up a better testing environment. V.