From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: nfsd changes for 2.6.37 Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:05:04 -0400 Message-ID: <20101031030504.GC24174@fieldses.org> References: <20101026164549.GD19445@fieldses.org> <20101027083924.GA28129@infradead.org> <20101027133924.GB6328@fieldses.org> <201010271546.09036.arnd@arndb.de> <20101027145538.GC6328@fieldses.org> <20101027145929.GA5788@infradead.org> <20101030212500.GE480@fieldses.org> <20101031020707.GB29702@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Linus Torvalds , Bryan Schumaker , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:47235 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753368Ab0JaDFI (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:05:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20101031020707.GB29702@infradead.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:07:08PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:25:00PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > We still need to do this part. I just did the minimum required to fix > > the problem--I figure splitting out a separate ->delete_lease method > > (which I agree would be cleaner) could wait till the next merge window. > > I'd say please do it now. The pre-allocated file_lock changes make > the semantics inside ->setlease really nasty right now. I think it's a > dumb idea to leave it that way even for a single merge window. OK, will do. --b.