Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([74.125.121.35]:3416 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756162Ab0LAWny (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:43:54 -0500 Received: from kpbe13.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe13.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.77]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id oB1MhqgF006184 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:43:52 -0800 Received: from pvf33 (pvf33.prod.google.com [10.241.210.97]) by kpbe13.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id oB1Mho7C027194 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:43:51 -0800 Received: by pvf33 with SMTP id 33so2511178pvf.15 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:43:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:43:42 -0800 (PST) From: Hugh Dickins To: Linus Torvalds cc: Andrew Morton , Trond Myklebust , Nick Piggin , Nick Bowler , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel , Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] NFS: Fix a memory leak in nfs_readdir In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1291217804-11257-1-git-send-email-Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> <1291217804-11257-2-git-send-email-Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> <20101201150428.GA2879@elliptictech.com> <1291217804-11257-3-git-send-email-Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> <1291217804-11257-4-git-send-email-Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> <1291229669.6609.24.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1291234251.6609.39.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20101201123341.d12ef362.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20101201133831.ea6ba10a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1291240272.6609.50.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20101201141351.8609140b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:51:12 -0500 > > Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:38 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> > Probably on most call paths we'll be OK - if a process is in the middle > >> > of a file truncate, holdin a file* ref which holds an inode ref then > >> > nobody will be unmounting that fs and hence nobody will be unloading > >> > that module. > >> > > >> > However on the random_code->alloc_page->vmscan->releasepage path, none > >> > of that applies. > >> > >> Just out of interest, what ensures that the mapping is still around for > >> the 'spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);' in __remove_mapping()? > > > > Nothing, afacit. > > No, we're good. > > Module unload has to go through a "stop_machine()" cycle, and that in > turn requires an idle period for everything. And just a preemption > reschedule isn't enough for that. > > So what is sufficient is that > > - we had the page locked and on the mapping > > This implies that we had an inode reference to the module, and the > page lock means that the inode reference cannot go away (because it > will involve invalidate-pages etc) I'm not so sure of that: doesn't it test inode->i_data.nrpages in various places, and skip ahead if that is already 0? I don't see the necessary serialization when nrpages comes down to 0. > > - we're not sleeping after __remove_mapping, so unload can't happen afterwards. > > A _lot_ of the module races depend on that latter thing. We have > almost no cases that are strictly about actual reference counts etc. Okay, I'm reassured on my module unload point; but not on the question of safety of spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock) which Trond lobbed back in return. Hugh