Message-ID: <4D0B54AD.1080702@RedHat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:16:45 -0500
From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
CC: trond.myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] NFS XDR clean up for 2.6.38
References: <20101214144747.2293.68070.stgit@matisse.1015granger.net> <4D0A6503.7010901@RedHat.com> <20101216230524.GA16760@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101216230524.GA16760@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
MIME-Version: 1.0


On 12/16/2010 06:05 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Steve,
> 
> I think it's totally out of place to try to put back large work on the
> whole nfs client for vendor interest in an absolute fringe feature.
All I was asking for is put more priority on the pNFS work than other
major work... Basically put the pNFS work in front of everything else..
 
> 
> I think you should at least be a bit ashamed for even putting this
> forward.
> 
No... I am not and will not be ashamed of trying to help this 
community, which I have been a member for a very long time, 
set priorities on work that will make the community even
stronger... 

steved.