Return-Path: <linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:50340 "EHLO
	mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751477Ab0LPQTv (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:19:51 -0500
Received: by iyi12 with SMTP id 12so1626953iyi.19
        for <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:19:50 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=8YmRfJ9w_QL1WBqQZPe9HeTA+fEm2MmAa-5Ja@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: NFSv4.1 callback service and UDP
From: "William A. (Andy) Adamson" <androsadamson@gmail.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
        NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0

Hi Bruce

I note that the current NFSv4.1 back channel supports UDP. Why? Should
we continue with UDP support?

Thanks

-->Andy