Return-Path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:36627 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751355Ab1AEIkW (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2011 03:40:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 09:40:14 +0100 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Trond Myklebust Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: still nfs problems [Was: Linux 2.6.37-rc8] Message-ID: <20110105084014.GN25121@pengutronix.de> References: <20101230171453.GA5787@pengutronix.de> <1293731992.4919.5.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20101230191846.GB14221@pengutronix.de> <20110103213850.GC25121@pengutronix.de> <1294100558.25100.8.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <1294100558.25100.8.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hello Trond, On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 07:22:38PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > The question is whether this is something happening on the server or the > client. Does an older client kernel boot without any trouble? I will set up a boot test with 2.6.37 (for statistics) and 2.6.36 to compare with. If you don't consider .36 to be old enough let me now. Once the setup is done it should be easy to test .35 (say), too. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |