Return-Path: Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com ([128.222.32.20]:35610 "EHLO mexforward.lss.emc.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932419Ab1CWSL4 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:11:56 -0400 From: To: , CC: Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:10:09 -0400 Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] NFS: Detect loops in a readdir due to bad cookies Message-ID: <5E6794FC7B8FCA41A704019BE3C70E8B0693F02D@MX31A.corp.emc.com> References: <4D8A3060.807@netapp.com> In-Reply-To: <4D8A3060.807@netapp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Doesn't returning identical cookies for multiple, different entries in the same directory constitute a protocol violation? ps -----Original Message----- From: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Schumaker Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 1:40 PM To: Trond >> "Myklebust, Trond" Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 3/3] NFS: Detect loops in a readdir due to bad cookies Some filesystems (such as ext4) can return the same cookie value for multiple files. If we try to start a readdir with one of these cookies, the server will return the first file found with a cookie of the same value. This can cause the client to enter an infinite loop. Signed-off-by: Bryan Schumaker --- fs/nfs/dir.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/nfs_fs.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c index b503791..dc475a7 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/dir.c +++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c @@ -139,7 +139,9 @@ static struct nfs_open_dir_context *alloc_nfs_open_dir_context(struct rpc_cred * struct nfs_open_dir_context *ctx; ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); if (ctx != NULL) { + ctx->duped = 0; ctx->dir_cookie = 0; + ctx->dup_cookie = 0; ctx->cred = get_rpccred(cred); } return ctx; @@ -342,11 +344,18 @@ static int nfs_readdir_search_for_cookie(struct nfs_cache_array *array, nfs_readdir_descriptor_t *desc) { int i; + int new_pos; int status = -EAGAIN; + struct nfs_open_dir_context *ctx = desc->file->private_data; for (i = 0; i < array->size; i++) { if (array->array[i].cookie == *desc->dir_cookie) { - desc->file->f_pos = desc->current_index + i; + new_pos = desc->current_index + i; + if (new_pos < desc->file->f_pos) { + ctx->dup_cookie = *desc->dir_cookie; + ctx->duped = 1; + } + desc->file->f_pos = new_pos; desc->cache_entry_index = i; return 0; } @@ -731,6 +740,18 @@ int nfs_do_filldir(nfs_readdir_descriptor_t *desc, void *dirent, int i = 0; int res = 0; struct nfs_cache_array *array = NULL; + struct nfs_open_dir_context *ctx = file->private_data; + + if (ctx->duped == 1 && ctx->dup_cookie == *desc->dir_cookie) { + if (printk_ratelimit()) { + pr_notice("NFS: directory %s/%s contains a readdir loop. " + "Please contact your server vendor.", + file->f_dentry->d_parent->d_name.name, + file->f_dentry->d_name.name); + } + res = -ELOOP; + goto out; + } array = nfs_readdir_get_array(desc->page); if (IS_ERR(array)) { diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h index 4b87c00..bbb812b 100644 --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h @@ -97,7 +97,9 @@ struct nfs_open_context { struct nfs_open_dir_context { struct rpc_cred *cred; + int duped; __u64 dir_cookie; + __u64 dup_cookie; }; /* -- 1.7.4.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html