From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [105/105] nfsd4: fix oops on lock failure Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:16:43 -0400 Message-ID: <20110418171640.GJ20935@pad.home.fieldses.org> References: <20110412143559.186613198@clark.kroah.org> <87pqokx6lr.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <20110418153236.GC20935@pad.home.fieldses.org> <87ipubwnj3.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <8762qbwnf1.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <87zknnv7id.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, OGAWA Hirofumi , akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: stable-bounces@linux.kernel.org Errors-To: stable-bounces@linux.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:59:26AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:39 AM, OGAWA Hirofumi > wrote: > > > > For now, I feel this explain filp leak on my system. the leak is > > increased slowly (filp, cred_jar, and no nfs* slabs), and leak is on > > nfs server side. > > > > I'll start test of this patch, and see what happens. > > Can somebody ping/remind me when that is verified - preferably about > _both_ patches, even if it turns out that the first one by Ogawa > wasn't the one that caused the problem? > > Or can I just assume that the fix will be in Bruce's pull requests some day? I'll send a pull request when it's sorted out, thanks. --b. _______________________________________________ stable mailing list stable@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable