Return-Path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:13411 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751231Ab1EETIS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2011 15:08:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: Allow NULL nameidata in d_revalidate and create From: Trond Myklebust To: Tyler Hicks Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net In-Reply-To: <20110505185839.GF12250@boyd.l.tihix.com> References: <1304609741-12541-1-git-send-email-tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110505155728.GB12250@boyd.l.tihix.com> <1304613413.20441.2.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20110505185839.GF12250@boyd.l.tihix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 15:08:16 -0400 Message-ID: <1304622496.20441.23.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 13:58 -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote: > On Thu May 05, 2011 at 12:36:53PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 10:57 -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote: > > > On Thu May 05, 2011 at 10:35:41AM -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote: > > > > To add support for eCryptfs mounts on top of NFS client mounts, the NFS > > > > client must properly handle NULL nameidata pointers in its d_revalidate > > > > functions. > > > > > > > > NFS clients should also handle NULL nameidata in its create functions, > > > > although this is not currently required for eCryptfs support. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks > > > > --- > > > > > > We (eCryptfs) are in the process of switching mailing lists, so I copied > > > both the old (launchpad.net) and the new (vger.kernel.org), but it > > > doesn't look like the vger.kernel.org list is accepting mail yet. Sorry > > > about that, I should have tested it first. Feel free to drop it from > > > any replies. > > > > > > I should also mention that if/when this patch is merged, eCryptfs will > > > have basic support of mounting on top of NFSv3 client mounts. I say > > > basic because I'm sure there are some bugs, I'm not yet confident that > > > the required cache flushes are there in the eCryptfs layer to have NFSv3 > > > cache consistency, and we have some trouble with silly rename. > > > > > > All files unlinked through eCryptfs get silly renamed in the NFS client > > > because of the extra reference eCryptfs holds on the NFS dentry. > > > > > > This also seems to come into play when unlinking the last file in a > > > directory and then immediately removing the directory. nfs_rmdir() will > > > sometimes return -EBUSY. > > > > > > BTW, I think these are all issues that should be handled in the eCryptfs > > > layer, but I wanted to provide an update on the status of eCryptfs on > > > top of NFS. > > > > Why would we want to 'support' ecryptfs in this manner? Can't you set up > > a proper nameidata with appropriate open intents? > > Sorry, that was bad wording in my commit message. NFS would not be > "supporting" eCryptfs. eCryptfs supports the filesystem that it is > mounted on top of. We keep any quirks from the stacking scheme in > fs/ecryptfs/ and don't expect filesystems to do anything special for > eCryptfs. > > In this case, I believe it is a bug for NFS to oops on NULL nameidata in > d_revalidate. It was introduced by 34286d66 and 657e94b6 and has been > fixed in most other filesystems (9177ada9, 8ce84eeb, 4714e637, 53fe9241, > 529c5f95, 0eb980e3). > > I saw two potential oopses in the NFS create functions and patched > those, too. However, in the case of create, eCryptfs does pass a proper > nameidata to vfs_create(). Does it do so to d_revalidate() when opening a file? > > > > This patch might allow you to look up files on NFS, but without open > > intents, you certainly won't be able to open them, nor will you be able > > to create them (as you seem to believe). > > I'm not sure why open and create would not work. My testing shows that > with this patch applied, I can compile the kernel in an eCryptfs mount > mounted on top of an NFSv3 client, run fsx-linux, etc. Please try testing with NFSv4, which requires intents in both lookup() and d_revalidate() when opening a file. -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com www.netapp.com