From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: NFSD Secinfo no name Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 11:53:37 -0400 Message-ID: <20110510155337.GB11698@fieldses.org> References: <4DC43CE7.7070705@netapp.com> <20110510005931.GD3600@fieldses.org> <4DC93200.3070706@netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" To: Bryan Schumaker Return-path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:38996 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754335Ab1EJPxi (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2011 11:53:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4DC93200.3070706@netapp.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:39:28AM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote: > On 05/09/2011 08:59 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 02:24:39PM -0400, Bryan Schumaker wrote: > >> Hi Bruce, > >> > >> On the call yesterday you asked me to double check that secinfo no name still works in NFSD. It does still work for me. > > > > My real question was whether the bug you reported here: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=130192462122087&w=2 > > > > appears to have been fixed (in my for-2.6.40 branch) to your > > satisfaction? > > Yes it has. That's what I was trying to answer, sorry if I wasn't clear. Oh, sorry, I misundertood then. Got it, thanks! --b.