From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: Re: [PATCH -V5 00/24] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:10:09 +0530 Message-ID: <87zkmqobhi.fsf__28252.5175637149$1305301253$gmane$org@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1298469131-16555-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110228211145.GG28617@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 To: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= JACKE , "Ted Ts'o" , sfrench@us.ibm.com, agruen@linbit.com, dilger.kernel@dilger.ca, sandeen@redhat.com, bfields@fieldses.org, jlay Return-path: Received: from e23smtp07.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.140]:37921 "EHLO e23smtp07.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754049Ab1EMPk1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2011 11:40:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 12 May 2011 00:16:13 +0200, Bj=C3=B6rn JACKE wro= te: > Hi, >=20 > On 2011-02-28 at 16:11 -0500 Ted Ts'o sent off: > > What is the current status of this patch series? I seem to remembe= r > > that Christoph and Al Viro had some objections; have those been > > cleared yet? If not, can you summarize what their objections are? > >=20 > > To be honest I haven't been paying super close attention to this pa= tch > > series, and I'm curious what needs to happen with it one way or > > another. >=20 > after the discussion of this path submission thread are there any maj= or or > minor issues left that prevent these to go upstream? I'd really love = to see > NFSv4 ACLs being available on Linux, too. >=20 I updated richaclv23 branch at=20 http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/kvaneesh/linux-richacl.git;= a=3Dsummary which is rebased against latest linus tree. The changes pass richacl test against local file system. I am yet to test richacl on NFS client. Once i get the results i will repost the series again.=20 -aneesh