Subject: Re: What is proper kernel tree to develop against?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110608190345.GA6752@fieldses.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:49:38 -0400
Cc: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
        linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Message-Id: <6598B49E-A6F0-4D7B-AC82-A675CF69E9C8@netapp.com>
References: <4DEFC244.2040306@candelatech.com> <20110608185219.GD3513@merit.edu> <20110608190345.GA6752@fieldses.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
MIME-Version: 1.0


On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:03 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:52:19PM -0400, Jim Rees wrote:
>> Ben Greear wrote:
>> 
>>  What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches
>>  for possible upstream acceptance?
>> 
>> I think for the stuff you're doing it would just be the upstream git tree at
>> kernel.org.  Note that nfs-utils is separate.
>> 
>> Has anyone pointed you to the wiki?  I think it answers many of these
>> questions, although it seems heavily slanted towards pnfs.
>> 
>> http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
> 
> It would be nice to reorganize the wiki, especially that top page.
> 
> I'd kind of like linux-nfs.org to just point to some page on the wiki
> some day.

I've actually signed up to revamp linux-nfs.org.  I'll begin work on that very soon (after bakeathon and my vacation).

-dros