Return-Path: Received: from mpc-26.sohonet.co.uk ([193.203.82.251]:36375 "EHLO moving-picture.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754416Ab1FFMON (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:14:13 -0400 Message-ID: <4DECC493.7070107@moving-picture.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:14:11 +0100 From: James Pearson To: "J. Bruce Fields" CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, steved@redhat.com Subject: Re: How to control the order of different export options for different client formats? References: <4DD2A084.1040905@moving-picture.com> <20110518080106.1159c5b8@notabene.brown> <4DD39D39.7010805@moving-picture.com> <20110518162050.GB16835@fieldses.org> <4DD66EC6.7090706@moving-picture.com> <20110520164147.GA11176@fieldses.org> <4DE79236.1080808@moving-picture.com> <20110604182011.GB23099@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20110604182011.GB23099@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 J. Bruce Fields wrote: > Looks good to me, thanks. > > My one quibble is with the statement that "single host" "is the most > common format". (I don't think we know that.) > > Fix that, and just resend with a brief changelog comment and a > > Signed-off-by: James Pearson > > and steved should get around to applying it eventually.... The "This is the most common format" statement is in the existing exports man page - i.e. nothing to do with my patch ... However, I'll remove that statement as well and submit the patch James Pearson