Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 15:03:45 -0400
To: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What is proper kernel tree to develop against?
Message-ID: <20110608190345.GA6752@fieldses.org>
References: <4DEFC244.2040306@candelatech.com>
 <20110608185219.GD3513@merit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20110608185219.GD3513@merit.edu>
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:52:19PM -0400, Jim Rees wrote:
> Ben Greear wrote:
> 
>   What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches
>   for possible upstream acceptance?
> 
> I think for the stuff you're doing it would just be the upstream git tree at
> kernel.org.  Note that nfs-utils is separate.
> 
> Has anyone pointed you to the wiki?  I think it answers many of these
> questions, although it seems heavily slanted towards pnfs.
> 
> http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

It would be nice to reorganize the wiki, especially that top page.

I'd kind of like linux-nfs.org to just point to some page on the wiki
some day.

--b.