Return-Path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:39714 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750943Ab1FHSlI (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:41:08 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.195] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns3.lanforge.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p58If8DH002436 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:41:08 -0700 Message-ID: <4DEFC244.2040306@candelatech.com> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:41:08 -0700 From: Ben Greear To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: What is proper kernel tree to develop against? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches for possible upstream acceptance? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com