Return-Path: Received: from int-mailstore01.merit.edu ([207.75.116.232]:45092 "EHLO int-mailstore01.merit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751538Ab1FHSwU (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:52:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:52:19 -0400 From: Jim Rees To: Ben Greear Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What is proper kernel tree to develop against? Message-ID: <20110608185219.GD3513@merit.edu> References: <4DEFC244.2040306@candelatech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4DEFC244.2040306@candelatech.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Ben Greear wrote: What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches for possible upstream acceptance? I think for the stuff you're doing it would just be the upstream git tree at kernel.org. Note that nfs-utils is separate. Has anyone pointed you to the wiki? I think it answers many of these questions, although it seems heavily slanted towards pnfs. http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page