From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: What is proper kernel tree to develop against? Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:13:14 -0400 Message-ID: <20110608201314.GC6752@fieldses.org> References: <4DEFC244.2040306@candelatech.com> <20110608185219.GD3513@merit.edu> <20110608190345.GA6752@fieldses.org> <6598B49E-A6F0-4D7B-AC82-A675CF69E9C8@netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jim Rees , Ben Greear , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Weston Andros Adamson Return-path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:54660 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751202Ab1FHUNR (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:13:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6598B49E-A6F0-4D7B-AC82-A675CF69E9C8@netapp.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:49:38PM -0400, Weston Andros Adamson wrote: > > On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:03 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:52:19PM -0400, Jim Rees wrote: > >> Ben Greear wrote: > >> > >> What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches > >> for possible upstream acceptance? > >> > >> I think for the stuff you're doing it would just be the upstream git tree at > >> kernel.org. Note that nfs-utils is separate. > >> > >> Has anyone pointed you to the wiki? I think it answers many of these > >> questions, although it seems heavily slanted towards pnfs. > >> > >> http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page > > > > It would be nice to reorganize the wiki, especially that top page. > > > > I'd kind of like linux-nfs.org to just point to some page on the wiki > > some day. > > I've actually signed up to revamp linux-nfs.org. I'll begin work on that very soon (after bakeathon and my vacation). OK, good! --b.